|
Post by Bob (DM) on May 28, 2014 21:19:45 GMT -5
OK, so the new Status Report worksheet is done and they have been sent out, hopefully there won't be a need for another major overhaul like that, and hopefully you will find it worth the wait.
If you have any questions or find any issues with it, just drop me a line and we'll get it sorted out.
Now for a little bit of rumour mongering.
Tensions are mounting in the Nansei-do where both the Mori and Watanabe have called up their reserves, and stone masons are in short supply, most of them having gone to Masaki and Yamaguchi where major projects have been started.
The Nishio Bunsha has begun a major renovation of it's shrine in Miyazu
The Lord of Oharu has been ill, and is rumoured to be unlikely to recover.
That's it that's all, it's over to you guys now.
|
|
|
Post by Bob (DM) on May 29, 2014 10:01:58 GMT -5
I have noticed that including the red holdings sheet makes the SR really big and cumbersome, how useful do you guys find it to have that info included in the SR as opposed to in a separate file?
|
|
Alex
Junior Member
Posts: 92
|
Post by Alex on May 29, 2014 10:49:38 GMT -5
I don't mind having it moved into a separate file, if this makes your life easier.
|
|
|
Post by Takahashi Rin - Tkh (Maggie) on May 29, 2014 11:10:05 GMT -5
Sweet baby Jesus, yes! What a load of work you did, and a load off of us.
As far as the holdings being in a separate file, well I do that anyway, so I can have them and the other sheet both on screen at the same time, I find it more convenient that way. Though I did notice that the only source holdings listed on mine were the ones in my province, so I am guessing you tailor that for everybody, I wondered why, since it would be loads easier for you if you didn't.
Aaaaand, now for some bad news. I think you have applied the capitals wrong. You have them adding to the maximum allowed court, but the rules site says they add to the effective level of the court (and you have the numbers wrong as well). Which is correct please?
|
|
|
Post by Bob (DM) on May 29, 2014 17:08:26 GMT -5
You know, you're right, it is done wrong. I will fix that straight away, thanks, for spotting it. As for the individualized sheets, well it's not really that much of a pain to do, and people aren't really supposed to know who owns source, it's not like a guild or temple that has buildings.
|
|
|
Post by Bob (DM) on May 29, 2014 18:30:18 GMT -5
OK, so I made the changes, what it does is take the bonus away from how much you can pay for court (and so reduces the maximum number of Court actions, but with the new Barony rule that isn't really a big deal), but instead adds it to the value of your court for the purposes of modifying actions. However, when checking the website, I noticed that the numbers there were not the ones I was using, so I updated that page to reflect what I was actually using (I figured it was only fair to let you guys have accurate info).
|
|
|
Post by Tanaka Kozo -Tnk (Tristan) on May 29, 2014 23:14:30 GMT -5
One thing I've noticed is that Prosperity modifier for each province that is looking at the effects of law/tax/troops/etc on future prosperity doesn't seem to be considering the impact of current prosperity on this.
I mention this as I was quite surprised by the very high prosperity numbers that are seen across most of the provinces and thought that perhaps this wasn't being considered.
|
|
|
Post by Bob (DM) on May 31, 2014 2:09:46 GMT -5
OK I just noticed that the Influence squares are not activating properly, so I will be fixing that.
|
|
|
Post by Bob (DM) on May 31, 2014 2:10:18 GMT -5
One thing I've noticed is that Prosperity modifier for each province that is looking at the effects of law/tax/troops/etc on future prosperity doesn't seem to be considering the impact of current prosperity on this.
I mention this as I was quite surprised by the very high prosperity numbers that are seen across most of the provinces and thought that perhaps this wasn't being considered. I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean
|
|
|
Post by Takahashi Rin - Tkh (Maggie) on May 31, 2014 13:46:26 GMT -5
I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but you did say to mention any problems we spotted -- well I was playing around with the SR (it's way cool and also way ambitious -- perhaps too much so) and it turns out there are a bunch of errors. 1. The Gross GB & RP income isn't right on the Treasury page, at least not according to my calculations from the holdings sheets. 2. The Admin section doesn't work if you roll exactly what you need, there is a ">" that needs to be a ">=". 3. The Balance column for GB on the Orders page is off, it references the Balance column on the Treasury page instead of the Net column, so the KB expenses are deducted twice. 4. The Court and Stability modifiers don't read right for actions done by any of the 2nd realm (KB, KBF, or KBM), they return a #N/A error for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by Takahashi Rin - Tkh (Maggie) on May 31, 2014 14:07:02 GMT -5
Ooops! I forgot one. 5. The GB & RP columns for the Actions section of the Treasury page don't work, they reference some weird hidden cell on the Actions page for some reason. In the GB one, the final "9" should be a "22", and in the RP one, the final "11" should be a "24", assuming I am reading your intent right.
|
|
|
Post by Takahashi Rin - Tkh (Maggie) on May 31, 2014 16:04:48 GMT -5
Found some more 6. The Court actions don't count the extra actions from Realm actions, it sums the wrong column.
|
|
|
Post by Bob (DM) on Jun 1, 2014 9:50:09 GMT -5
Wow! Um, please don't play around with the sheet more. Honestly, thanks a bunch, that is very helpful, I think I will grant you the title of Bug-Catcher-in-Chief! Corrections will be made, and properly functioning SRs sent out.
|
|
|
Post by Tanaka Kozo -Tnk (Tristan) on Jun 1, 2014 19:17:52 GMT -5
One thing I've noticed is that Prosperity modifier for each province that is looking at the effects of law/tax/troops/etc on future prosperity doesn't seem to be considering the impact of current prosperity on this.
I mention this as I was quite surprised by the very high prosperity numbers that are seen across most of the provinces and thought that perhaps this wasn't being considered. I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean Have a look at page 69-70 of the regent guide.
If you look at table 4-9 on page 69 you can see that the current prosperity level has a prosperity modifier attached to it (always a negative modifier). So at the higher end of prosperity people are happy for a while but tend to head back to being content, while at lower levels the rumblings of rebellion will become rebellion unless you do something about it.
Functionally it means that pushing prosperity above Content and keeping it there becomes extremely difficult.
|
|
|
Post by Bob (DM) on Jun 1, 2014 20:28:06 GMT -5
Well version 3 of the SR has been sent out, hopefully there are no more issues.
With regards to the Prosperity, yes I am aware of that table, I fear i am still unaware of what the problem is. The current Prosperity of each province is based on a system I used to set each province a different starting Prosperity, they will be modified by that table at the end of the turn.
|
|